95, 227 S.E.2d 892 (1976); Jones v. State, 139 Ga. App. Kyler v. State, 94 Ga. App. 416, 240 S.E.2d 917 (1977). 629, 700 S.E.2d 620 (2010). - When the trial was conducted by the court without a jury, there was no need for a separate hearing to consider prior similar crimes (two previous convictions for shoplifting) before the crimes were admitted. Taking against will of owner is essence of crime of larceny. Evidence was sufficient to support a conviction of theft by taking when an investigator hired by a company to investigate a sudden increase in company expenditures found that the defendant, a manager at the company, had written numerous company checks for personal use, diverted funds to the defendant's family, and falsified at least one loan; the jury was entitled to disbelieve the defendant's testimony that the company had authorized the defendant's expenditures. 721, 728 S.E.2d 874 (2012). The lists do not show all contributions to every state ballot measure, or each independent expenditure committee formed to support or Trial court did not err in imposing a felony sentence pursuant to O.C.G.A. Simmons v. State, 79 Ga. App. this Section. Felder v. State, 60 Ga. App. - Testimony from the victims of three auto thefts, along with statements given by defendant juvenile, were legally sufficient to support the defendant's delinquency adjudication for acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of burglary and theft by taking-vehicle. 535, 615 S.E.2d 603 (2005). S19C1422, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 15 (Ga. 2020). 301, 433 S.E.2d 616 (1993). 794, 652 S.E.2d 840 (2007), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 1051, 175 L. Ed. Robinson v. State, 152 Ga. App. Ward v. State, 312 Ga. App. Evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for theft by taking because, although the victim testified that the victim told the defendant to "take everything" prior to escaping from the defendant, there was evidence from which a reasonable juror could conclude that the defendant had already taken the victim's car and that the victim's subsequent relinquishment of the car was not done willingly; when the defendant drove away and returned on foot only after parking the vehicle at the defendant's cousin's house, the jury was authorized to find that the defendant intended to deprive the victim of the car's use, if even temporarily. 139, 348 S.E.2d 687 (1986). Our team has years of experience in developing, testing and maintaining software products. Cole v. State, 273 Ga. App. Evidence sufficient to enable rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of theft by taking and recklessly causing harm to or endangering bodily safety of another person. - Taxpayers were not entitled to a theft loss under 26 U.S.C. 16-8-5. Evidence was insufficient to convict the defendant of criminal attempt to commit theft by taking by a fiduciary as the relationship between the defendant and the employer was merely that of employer-employee because, although the defendant was responsible for creating invoices, the defendant did not have authority to act for the employer beyond weighing the metals and assigning to the weight a dollar amount that had been previously fixed by the employer; and the defendant could not negotiate with the customers or independently determine how much the metals were worth; thus, although the conviction for criminal attempt to commit theft by taking stood, the felony sentence, based on the defendant being a fiduciary, was reversed. Hubbard v. State, 168 Ga. App. (Laws 1833, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 791; Code 1863, 4290; Code 1868, 4327; Code 1873, 4393; Code 1882, 4393; Penal Code 1895, 155; Penal Code 1910, 152; Code 1933, 26-2602; Code 1933, 26-1802, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, 1; Ga. L. 1974, p. 468, 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 876, 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 2257, 1.). Cl. Calloway v. State, 176 Ga. App. 847, 273 S.E.2d 208 (1980); Change v. State, 156 Ga. App. You will immediately be given a bonus worth $25.The Bovada Bitcoin-Exclusive Membership level offers bettors the following perks and incentives: Weekly Deposit Match Bonus 50% Up To $500. 576, 271 S.E.2d 709 (1980). While recent possession of stolen goods, unexplained, will justify a conviction for larceny, the mere possession of goods several months subsequent to the time the goods were alleged to have been stolen, and a failure to satisfactorily account for such possession, will not alone authorize a conviction. Bryant v. State, 213 Ga. App. 149, 503 S.E.2d 380 (1998). 558. Defendant was properly convicted of felony theft by taking in violation of O.C.G.A. 277, 202 S.E.2d 837 (1973). Ragsdale v. State, 170 Ga. App. 391, 198 S.E. 16-8-2; consequently, the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. 602, 538 S.E.2d 492 (2000). In a prosecution for felony theft by taking of a van, the trial court was entitled to conclude that the victim was an innocent purchaser for value, believing the seller to be the owner, the defendant's claim to the contrary notwithstanding; moreover, pursuant to former O.C.G.A. 534, 687 S.E.2d 869 (2009). Brandeburg v. State, 292 Ga. App. - It was not essential to a charge under former Code 1933, 26-1802 (see now O.C.G.A. 875, 240 S.E.2d 231 (1977). For annual survey of criminal law, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. Chambers v. State, 327 Ga. App. 16-8-2. Cate v. Patterson, 354 Ga. App. Burkett v. State, 133 Ga. App. 210 (1932) (decided under former Penal Code 1910, 172, 174). Kyler v. State, 94 Ga. App. 821, 380 S.E.2d 505 (1989). 89, 299 S.E.2d 584 (1983). Kilby v. State, 335 Ga. App. McKinney v. State, 276 Ga. App. Evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of theft by taking of a motorcycle, a helmet and jacket, and a truck because keys to the truck were found in the defendant's motel room, keys to the motorcycle were found in the truck, and witnesses tied the defendant to both the truck and the motorcycle. Thurston v. State, 186 Ga. App. 16-8-2) to fail to define "unlawful taking" or the manner in which the property was taken, because the statute does not define "unlawful taking" and makes the manner of taking irrelevant. Value was not an element of the crime of theft by taking as proscribed by former Code 1933, 26-1802 (see O.C.G.A. Clarke v. State, 317 Ga. App. 213, 270 S.E.2d 379 (1980). "Sinc can i drink coffee while taking letrozole. 161, 620 S.E.2d 433 (2005). Roman v. State, 300 Ga. App. 16-8-4. Restaurant was robbed, the manager was fatally shot, and the manager's car was stolen. Kilby v. State, 335 Ga. App. When the defendant was found, two hours after the theft of an automobile temporarily left with the motor running in front of a liquor store, driving the automobile away from another liquor store, is sufficient evidence on such a hearing that the defendant stole the vehicle. 30, 567 S.E.2d 693 (2002). 196, 276 S.E.2d 689 (1981). Jackson v. State, 284 Ga. 826, 672 S.E.2d 640 (2009). - Defendant's burglary and theft by taking charges involving the same house were not based on the same facts; the burglary was complete when the defendant entered the dwelling house with the intent to commit theft, and the theft by taking occurred when the defendant actually took the property described in the indictment. weegee. Value, is however, relevant in ascertaining punishment to be imposed. Bryan v. State, 148 Ga. App. 684, 4 S.E.2d 734 (1939) (decided under former Code 1933, 26-2603). 512, 574 S.E.2d 548 (2002). - After the defendant was convicted on 52 counts related to the defendant's theft of more than $600,000 as the operator of a Ponzi scheme, although the trial court did not err in failing to merge the defendant's convictions for theft by conversion and theft by deception into the defendant's convictions for theft by taking, because theft by taking proscribed certain criminal conduct generally, while theft by conversion and theft by deception were specific crimes, the defendant's convictions for theft by taking merged into the defendant's convictions for theft by conversion and theft by deception; thus, the defendant's sentences for theft by taking were vacated, and the case was remanded to the trial court for resentencing. - Evidence showed that defendant committed robbery either by use of a replica of a handgun or by intimidation and no evidence was presented that intimidation was not used in the robbery; therefore, defendant was not entitled to a charge on theft by taking as a lesser included offense of armed robbery and robbery by intimidation. Southern Ins. Warfle v. State, 157 Ga. App. 2d 1366 (N.D. Ga. 2012). 892, 825 S.E.2d 379 (2019). 728, 212 S.E.2d 870 (1975). Newton v. State, 261 Ga. App. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in failing to grant appellant's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal as to one of the counts of theft by taking. Barstad v. State, 329 Ga. App. 641, 692 S.E.2d 9 (2010). Stancell v. State, 146 Ga. App. 15-11-63 vacated. Modern status: instruction allowing presumption or inference of guilt from possession of recently stolen property as violation of defendant's privilege against self-incrimination, 88 A.L.R.3d 1178. 579, 254 S.E.2d 900 (1979). 16-8-12. - Rule of evidence to the effect that where stolen goods are found in the possession of a defendant charged with larceny or kindred offenses recently after the commission of the offense, such fact authorizes the jury to infer that the accused is guilty unless such possession is explained to its satisfaction, constitutes an inference of fact and not of law, and is based upon a circumstantial fact from which the inference of guilt may be drawn in the absence of satisfactory explanation. 109, 570 S.E.2d 405 (2002). 467, 477 S.E.2d 895 (1996). 773, 247 S.E.2d 587 (1978); Hight v. State, 221 Ga. App. When the defendant, who was not in custody at the time, volunteered an explanation as to why the defendant possessed a weapon without authority, no Miranda warning was necessary and the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant inflicted a shot upon the defendant's person in a government building with a weapon that defendant took from police custody in violation of O.C.G.A. Branan v. State, 285 Ga. App. These are the welcome bonuses that Bovada offers for first-time depositors to the site. 620, 624 S.E.2d 244 (2005). - Allegations under the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, O.C.G.A. 16-8-2 because the evidence was sufficient to prove that the indigent defense money the defendant received was the property of a law firm; an agreement existed between the defendant and the firm for the payment of indigent defense monies to the firm. Ct. R. 33.10; hence, a lack of compliance with the rule could not serve as a basis to allow the withdrawal of the plea. 16-8-2 for stealing lumber and other materials from a builder's job site because the evidence was sufficient for the trial court to determine that the fair cash market value of the property at the time and place of the theft exceeded $500 when according to the builder, the cost of the materials was $450, and the cost of the labor to construct the jigs was approximately $200, bringing the total value of the stolen property to $650; the builder clearly established knowledge, experience, and familiarity with the value of the property and, thus, established reasons for the value, having an opportunity for forming such an opinion. Att'y Gen. No. Classification of punishment determined by value of property taken. Taking and pledging or pawning, another's property as larceny, 82 A.L.R.2d 863. 300, 190 S.E.2d 606 (1972). 321, 480 S.E.2d 616 (1997); Jordan v. State, 224 Ga. App. FNF x Pibby Vs Annoying Orange is a Rhythm Game you can play online for free in full screen at KBH Games. However, one conviction for theft by taking currency was reversed on appeal as the victim who alleged that the defendant stole the victim's wallet testified that the victim never kept cash in the wallet, and the indictment specifically stated that currency was taken. Kent v. State, 66 Ga. App. 545, 662 S.E.2d 323 (2008). - Even though all the crimes were alleged to have been perpetrated by members of the same family, a sister acting individually as to the theft by taking and jointly with her brother as to armed robberies, severance was warranted since the three crimes were not part of a common scheme or plan and there was no viable "common scheme or plan" connecting the theft by taking with the armed robberies. v. State, 131 Ga. App. Bryan v. State, 148 Ga. App. 580, 565 S.E.2d 904 (2002). Near Me. 547, 528 S.E.2d 858 (2000). 59, 232 S.E.2d 396 (1977). Lupoe v. State, 284 Ga. 576, 669 S.E.2d 133 (2008). 571, 200 S.E.2d 370 (1973); Walker v. Caldwell, 476 F.2d 213 (5th Cir. Theft by receiving stolen property, O.C.G.A. 404, 745 S.E.2d 689 (2013). 366, 228 S.E.2d 387 (1976); Causey v. State, 139 Ga. App. As your consulting partner, we cover the organization process, so you dont need to search for help by yourself and can finally focus on the crucial business activities. We have a proven track record of dozens of finished projects and lasting partnerships with our customers. 497, 759 S.E.2d 574 (2014). 739, 289 S.E.2d 555 (1982); Brown v. State, 162 Ga. App. Description. Earley v. State, 155 Ga. App. Regular price $500.00 Sale price $500.00 Regular price. Evidence supported defendant's conviction for theft of trailers and tires being delivered in the trailers where defendant and a codefendant were seen moments after having returned one of the missing trailers, where they subsequently tried to flee from the police, where defendant's explanation for defendant's presence at the scene was undermined by other testimony, where a note in defendant's pocket described the crime scene, and where defendant and the codefendant gave conflicting accounts of their travel plans; the fact that one trailer was withheld temporarily and later returned with half its load missing did not mean that that trailer was not "taken." Matthews v. State, 257 Ga. App. Below are lists of the top 10 contributors to committees that have raised at least $1,000,000 and are primarily formed to support or oppose a state ballot measure or a candidate for state office in the November 2022 general election. - Guilt of the accused depends upon the intent with which the act was committed, and intent is a material ingredient of the crime. 907, 371 S.E.2d 869 (1988); Howell v. State, 188 Ga. App. 42, 329 S.E.2d 252 (1985). We do it by providing access to the best software development and IT integration companies, mostly from Eastern Europe. Gregg v. State, 331 Ga. App. The short is based on the Roblox horror game Doors in which you have to open doors to avoid the monsters that are chasing you. 456, 643 S.E.2d 892 (2007). - Three theft-by-taking counts against a defendant required merger since the case involved one victim who was robbed of multiple items in a single transaction; therefore, only one robbery was committed. 375, 646 S.E.2d 339 (2007). Unit price / per . Ownership of stolen property must be alleged directly and not by way of inference and is properly laid as of the date when the offense was committed. 232, 704 S.E.2d 470 (2010). When a single victim was robbed of multiple items in a single transaction, there was only one robbery, and the same evidence was used to prove both the theft and the armed robbery charges. Last checked. 122, 495 S.E.2d 596 (1998). 555, 654 S.E.2d 670 (2007), cert. - Although the state argued that a juvenile had been adjudicated on five separate petitions setting out five separate felonies, because the record revealed that adjudication had occurred on only two prior occasions for acts which, if done by an adult, would have been felonies, the juvenile's sentence under O.C.G.A. Cl. 16-8-2 was not warranted under circumstances in which the defendant used force to take the victim's purse and then the victim's money; the fact that the purse was not in the victim's hands during the second taking did not preclude an armed robbery conviction. Right-click on it, and click on New to assign a new macro to show the form. Same rules apply to the ascertainment of value of personalty whether that personalty is the subject of a negligence case or the object of a theft in a criminal case; value is value in whichever context. Shepherd v. State, 234 Ga. 75, 214 S.E.2d 535 (1975). Cookston v. State, 309 Ga. App. 16-8-2 sufficiently broad to encompass thefts or larcenies perpetrated by deception and theft by conversion. However, you will find that, on occasion, Bovada promotes a range of exciting no deposit bonus code offers.Claim your 150% in welcome package in Bovada Casino. Lundy v. State, 195 Ga. App. 629, 602 S.E.2d 158 (2004). Defendant's conviction for felony theft by taking over $500.00 was supported by the evidence as defendant was accused of stealing over $500.00 in the aggregate over a 35-month period; the state could aggregate the amount of money stolen over a period of time into one count in an accusation. 663, 760 S.E.2d 664 (2014). 16-8-2. When a car buyer appealed a district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of a lender, the Georgia criminal statutes for trespassing and theft, O.C.G.A. denied, No. Their consulting proved to be the tune-up we needed to improve our campaign results. Sale price: $350.00.Terp Slurper Sort by Sort by Show 24 36 48 View as Sold out from $480.00 . 279, 754 S.E.2d 815 (2014). 1, 660 S.E.2d 810 (2008); Barron v. State, 291 Ga. App. 84, 329 S.E.2d 186 (1985); Hambrick v. State, 174 Ga. App. 158, 259 S.E.2d 162 (1979); Perkins v. State, 151 Ga. App. 478, 218 S.E.2d 153 (1975); Rhodes v. State, 135 Ga. App. 115k. Stack-Thorpe v. State, 270 Ga. App. Former Code 1933, 26-1802(a) (see now O.C.G.A. 24-6-620). S16C0653, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 437 (Ga. 2016). 695, 356 S.E.2d 673 (1987). Thus, the case required a remand for an adjudication of delinquency and a disposition thereof to be entered against the juvenile for committing an act which would have supported a conviction for the offense of misdemeanor theft by taking since the value of the stolen property only was relevant as to the conviction's classification as a felony versus a misdemeanor. 652, 448 S.E.2d 719 (1994). 16-8-2) that the indictment do more than inform the accused generally of the items which it contended were taken. In the Interest of A. G., 355 Ga. App. 16-8-2 and16-8-12(a)(1) for taking more than $500 from potential buyers of ecstasy pills and then fleeing with the money without delivering the promised pills, since there was sufficient evidence that defendant took more than $500 despite defendant's claim that the money was counterfeit after one of the buyers testified that the buyer contributed $1,000 of real money to the total that was given to defendant. Our software development professionals will deliver the product tailored to your needs. 113, 240 S.E.2d 238 (1977). Harvey v. State, 344 Ga. App. - Indictment for robbery by force, O.C.G.A. Trial court did not err in concluding that the victim's testimony was sufficient to allow a felony theft charge to go to the jury because the victim testified as to the market value for each of the items stolen from the victim, and the total value exceeded $500; the victim established that the victim had an opportunity to form a correct opinion because the victim based the opinion as to the market value of the stolen tools on the age of the tools and the victim's experience using and purchasing the tools. The officer's testimony that the sister said the taking was without the sister's permission was inadmissible hearsay and was insufficient to support the adjudication even though the evidence was admitted without objection. Evidence that the defendant was involved in numerous wire transfers for products or services that were not produced or tendered, thousands of checks made out to different individuals were deposited into the defendant's bank account, and the defendant had two large deposits in the defendant's possession when arrested was sufficient to support the defendant's convictions for theft by taking. Mullins v. State, 267 Ga. App. - Defendant was not entitled to an instruction regarding theft by taking under O.C.G.A. Find experienced ERP professionals to build a business process management software specifically for your company. On the trial of a defendant charged with the offense of larceny, where there is some evidence descriptive of the stolen property which is substantially conformable to the description alleged in the indictment, and nowhere contradictory thereof, the identity of the stolen property is a matter addressed peculiarly and solely to the jury, and in such case there is no fatal variance between the allegata and the probata. JPMorgan Chase has reached a milestone five years in the making the bank says it is now routing all inquiries from third-party apps and services to access customer data through its secure application programming interface instead of allowing these services to collect data through screen scraping. - Trial court committed reversible error when the court failed to follow the bright line test, as required by State v. Germany and Ga. Unif. 196, 270 S.E.2d 367 (1980). Teal v. State, 282 Ga. 319, 647 S.E.2d 15 (2007). Object of the description of stolen chattels is to individualize the transaction, and enable the court to see that the chattels are, in law, the subjects of larceny. 674, 337 S.E.2d 397 (1985). State criminal prosecution against medical practitioner for fraud in connection with claims under Medicaid, Medicare, or similar welfare program for providing medical services, 79 A.L.R.6th 125. Peacock v. State, 131 Ga. App. denied, No. Super. McNeese v. State, 186 Ga. App. Conviction for theft by taking was supported by evidence that the defendant, without permission from the rightful owner, made use of real property by charging rent to tenants and that the value of the property taken was over $500. McClain v. State, 301 Ga. App. Watch until the very end for bonus footage! 761, 811 S.E.2d 479 (2018), cert. It must appear that stolen property was of some value or a conviction for theft by taking cannot be sustained. Callahan v. State, 148 Ga. App. In the former there is an entrustment and in the latter there is not. 663, 658 S.E.2d 210 (2008). Smith v. State, 265 Ga. App. 440, 533 S.E.2d 455 (2000). 795, 234 S.E.2d 327 (1977); Malone v. State, 142 Ga. App. 2d 1218 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2007). - In a declaratory judgment case in which three intended beneficiaries alleged that an insurance company violated O.C.G.A. To make Medium work, we log user data. In the Interest of E.C., 311 Ga. App. Larceny is completed when there is asportation, however slight, although the goods are not removed from the land of the owner. End Sub. The Dryer Is Getting Too Hot Yale features a huge selection of washers, dryers + washer-dryer units, and is centrally located near Revere, Braintree, Belmont, Somerville, Medford + Watertown Electrolux dryer review by a repair man pros and cons Remove a few items and restart the dryer Accessories Accessories. Ray v. State, 165 Ga. App. This is especially true where many different articles of various kinds, brands and sizes were stolen, and articles similar in make, brand, character, and appearance to the stolen ones were found in the recent possession of the accused. 16-8-2 for failing to transmit to a law firm, payments the defendant received for indigent defense work because the statute of frauds, O.C.G.A. 114 (1930) (decided under former Penal Code 1910, 172 and 174). S.D. Portfolio, business, app, eCommerce demos for all the niches are created with the help of industry specialists. Garner v. Victory Express, Inc., 214 Ga. App. The mod features entities from the horror game DOORS on Roblox made by LSPLASH and All DOORS Codes. Indictments for two previous convictions for shoplifting were sufficient on their face to show the remaining elements of the required foundation and the convictions were admissible as going to the defendant's state of mind, when the defendant admitted walking out of the store with the clothing on this occasion one year later. Word "theft" is word of general and broad connotation, covering any criminal appropriation of another's property to the taker's use, unlike "larceny," a technical word of art with narrowly defined meaning. Patterson v. State, 289 Ga. App. Retail value or price is standard to be used in theft by taking cases from retail establishments and where once established the wholesale price is not relevant. Simmons v. State, 287 Ga. App. - When there is a continuous series of conversions of property of the owner entrusted to the defendant, the offense may be charged in a single count of the indictment since such series of transactions constitute but a single embezzlement. 24-4-404). - 52B C.J.S., Larceny, 1 et seq., 15, 85, 88. 419, 323 S.E.2d 280 (1984); Thomas v. State, 177 Ga. App. Phanamixay v. State, 260 Ga. App. 643, 4 S.E.2d 716 (1939) (decided under former Code 1933, 26-2603). 293, 444 S.E.2d 840 (1994). Mandatory Fields are indicated by * . Indictments charging two attorneys with theft by taking in connection with a client's property transfers were sufficient in that they tracked the statutory language, placed defendants on notice of the charges against the defendants, and sufficiently alleged a statute of limitations exception. 229. 16-8-2 as defendant took a car and its contents, including a victim's handgun, with the intent to deprive the owners of the property; the evidence included: (1) testimony as to the gunman's size; (2) testimony that the car's rims were found at defendant's home; (3) testimony that a victim's cell phone made calls to defendant's home; (4) an accomplice's reference to the gunman as "B"; and (5) similar transaction evidence of another carjacking, involving a car of the make and color as a car used in the hijacking of the victims' car. 108, 840 S.E.2d 489 (2020). Conley v. State, 281 Ga. App. - When the evidence on behalf of the defendant denied the charge of armed robbery, and was such that it would have authorized the jury to find the defendant guilty of either of the two lesser offenses of robbery by intimidation or theft by taking, the failure of the trial court to charge on robbery by intimidation and theft by taking required the grant of a new trial. 16-2-20. Adamas Solutions is an outstanding IT consulting expert, providing his clients with highly strategic, insightful, and actionable recommendations that enable them to make immediate improvements. 433, 801 S.E.2d 300 (2017). Wilson v. State, 211 Ga. App. 425, 373 S.E.2d 216, cert. 24-8-803) because the business records exception did not require that the person laying the foundation for the admission of business records be the custodian of the records. 16-8-2, because: (1) the perpetrator of a crime entered just before closing time a fast-food restaurant with a gun and directed the employees into a room, a cooler, and a freezer; (2) the perpetrator took money from the restaurant, shot one of the employees, and left the scene in the employee's car; (3) one of the employees telephoned relatives with a cell phone and told them what was happening; (4) the relatives called the police, came to the restaurant, and saw the perpetrator drive away; (5) money, a gun, and discarded clothing was recovered from the car or the area where the perpetrator fled on foot; (6) a police officer, who was pursuing the perpetrator, was wounded in an altercation with the perpetrator when the officer's gun discharged; (7) when the defendant later surrendered to the police, DNA from the officer's blood was found on the defendant's chest; and (8) the employees, the relatives, and the officer identified the defendant, a former employee of the restaurant who was fired days before the crime, as the perpetrator. 602, 527 S.E.2d 256 (1999). 17, 435 S.E.2d 60 (1993). psst 50 Knobs. Manley v. State, 287 Ga. App. 284, 603 S.E.2d 772 (2004). 191, 663 S.E.2d 844 (2008), cert. You can use the following basic syntax to replace values in a column of a pandas DataFrame based on a condition: #replace values in 'column1' that are greater than 10 with 20 df. Ketcham v. State, 181 Ga. App. While the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction of theft by taking of a motor vehicle under O.C.G.A. In the Interest of L.J., 279 Ga. App. 31, 2017). What amounts to "exclusive" possession of stolen goods to support inference of burglary or other felonious taking, 51 A.L.R.3d 727. Lanier v. State, 269 Ga. App. 95, 748 S.E.2d 514 (2013); Lucas v. State, 328 Ga. App. Kilby v. State, 335 Ga. App. 588, 791 S.E.2d 92 (2016). 16-8-2, as the owner of the stolen property testified as to seeing the defendant take the property, the state's evidence was insufficient under O.C.G.A. 207, 300 S.E.2d 543 (1983); Lovett v. State, 165 Ga. App. - When the state's evidence established all of the elements of burglary and defendant, testifying in defendant's own behalf, admitted all of the allegations of the indictment, the lesser included offense of theft by taking was not raised by the evidence and it was not error to fail to charge the jury on this lesser crime as a possible verdict. No matter what your IT or software needs are, we can come up with a complex solution and strategy to suit your business plan. - When the owner of a stolen utility trailer testified that the owner had purchased the utility trailer for $1,100 and had made improvements to the trailer, this testimony alone was sufficient to establish that the trailer had some value at the time the trailer was stolen, which was all that was necessary to sustain a conviction for theft by taking; thus, the defendant was properly convicted of misdemeanor theft by taking. This Friday, were taking a look at Microsoft and Sonys increasingly bitter feud over Call of Duty and whether U.K. regulators are leaning toward torpedoing the Activision Blizzard deal. Gen. Life & Accident Ins. 299, 540 S.E.2d 254 (2000); Mullinax v. State, 273 Ga. 756, 545 S.E.2d 891 (2001); Thomas v. State, 249 Ga. App. Evidence that the defendant misled a victim into believing that the defendant was an American father and businessman who was having financial difficulty in Malaysia and needed money to pay a hotel bill so that the defendant would not be arrested and could return to the defendant's children in the United States was sufficient to support a conviction for theft by taking. 277, 202 S.E.2d 837 (1973). - State should not have been permitted to cross-examine the defendant as to whether the defendant was aware of an acquaintance's past criminal indictment for running stolen goods. 16-8-2, and six counts of felony theft by conversion, in violation of O.C.G.A. Banks v. State, 74 Ga. App. Massey v. State, 269 Ga. App. Once your account is created you will be able to claim the $100 free chip. 733, 16 S.E.2d 497 (1941) (decided under former Code 1933, 26-2603). 16-8-2,16-8-3, and16-8-4, those criminal statutes did not create a private cause of action. Chainsaw Man and Hammer Man are from the 2022 Chainsaw Man anime. 842, 275 S.E.2d 755 (1980). 2d 1258 (N.D. Ga. 2007); Tiller v. State, 286 Ga. App. 16-8-2 as the juvenile was only a passenger in a truck belonging to the father of the juvenile's friend and did not know that the friend did not have permission to drive the truck. 26, 354 S.E.2d 655 (1987). Flinchum v. State, 141 Ga. App. FNF Character Test Playground 4 game was added December 6, 2021 at our site and since then have been played 4.85K times.More about the game: Play Fnf Character Test Playground 4 mod game online and enter the game arena to start dancing on fun tunes in-game. 679, 732 S.E.2d 771 (2012). Hamlett v. State, 350 Ga. App. Stream Horrortale - Assured Prey [Fnf Version] by Laisa on desktop and mobile. 288, 648 S.E.2d 746 (2007). In a theft by taking case involving the theft of donations to an animal shelter, the evidence was sufficient to prove that venue was proper in Rabun County, Georgia, as the defendant exercised control over the money in that county because the state elicited direct testimony that the animal shelter was located in that county, that the defendant's residence was located in that county, that one bank used in the theft was located in that county, that one branch of another bank was located in that county, and that the defendant's "fundraising" efforts were conducted in that county, on either the defendant's home or work computer. 8, 619 S.E.2d 720 (2005). In the Interest of E.J., 292 Ga. App. 794, 652 S.E.2d 840 (2007), cert. Christian v. State, 288 Ga. App. Evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's convictions for, inter alia, malice murder, theft by taking an automobile, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon as the defendant admitted to a cellmate and to a cousin's roommate that the defendant fatally shot the cousin when the cousin told the defendant to move out of a shared apartment; there was also physical evidence, the recovery of the gun used in the incident, and witness testimony that supported the conviction. Since theft by taking encompasses theft by conversion, O.C.G.A. 397, 211 S.E.2d 7 (1974); Rhodes v. State, 233 Ga. 899, 213 S.E.2d 870 (1975); Breland v. State, 135 Ga. App. - By proving the corpus delicti, the venue, and the recent possession of the stolen property, and its sale by the defendant, the state makes a prima-facie case. 668, 754 S.E.2d 636 (2014). Stocks v. State, 119 Ga. App. S07C0315, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 67 (Ga. 2007). Our cryptographs help you to build your cryptosystem of any complexity and create security protocols for your data. Evidence that the defendant's DNA was found on a soda can left inside the victim's house after the burglary, the victim's stolen property was found in a house where the defendant was residing, and the defendant fled when officers tried to arrest the defendant was sufficient so support the defendant's convictions for burglary and theft by taking. 2d 892 (2010). There is only one such crime, and upon conviction for it, the punishment only is determined by the value of the property taken. Evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for theft by taking through the defendant's breach of fiduciary obligations as the evidence showed the defendant, who worked for a construction company, was hired to manage an apartment complex the company had built after the defendant persuaded the company's owner that another man was not trustworthy enough to be hired and thereafter kept some of the rent money the defendant collected from the tenants even though the defendant was supposed to turn that money over to the owner. Casino Welcome Bonus: The Bovada welcome bonus is a three-part matching bonus worth up to $3000. Auto. denied, 187 Ga. App. Genieen Sie die ganze Woche von Pibby Annoying Orange Mod, machen Sie Ihre eigene Musik FNF Mods. Strickland v. State, 348 Ga. App. Jefferson v. State, 279 Ga. App. A mod of Friday Night Funkin where Boyfriend rap-battle against a corrupted and glitchy version of Finn and Jake from Adventure time. We cater to both men and women offering a warm and comfortable experience. 16-8-2) if condemnee severs trade fixtures from a condemned parcel of property and carries them away, even though such fixtures are paid for by the department in condemnation proceedings. Vassell v. United States AG, 839 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. Play over 265 million tracks for free on SoundCloud. Rautenberg v. State, 178 Ga. App. 1987); Henderson v. State, 257 Ga. 618, 362 S.E.2d 346 (1987); Abelman v. State, 185 Ga. App. 16-8-2) was sufficiently broad to encompass thefts or larcenies perpetrated by deception as prohibited under former Code 1933, 26-1803 (see now O.C.G.A. Godly MM2 Value List: Chroma items falls into this Godly category. 722, 544 S.E.2d 542 (2001); Goss v. State, 247 Ga. App. Trial court did not err in assessing the value of a six car hauling trailer at $13,000 because an expert testified that based on the expert's experience, the fair market value of the trailer would be between $13,000 and $15,000, and the evidence showed that there was a basis for that value; evidence of the expert's experience in the equipment valuation field provided evidence of an obvious opportunity to gain familiarity with equipment values, creating at least a minimal basis for that value evidence. - There are not two crimes of theft by taking, one being a misdemeanor and the other being a felony. Baker v. State, 311 Ga. App. 4.5. Evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of theft by taking as the defendant drove away from the scene of the shooting in the vehicle belonging to the victim's girlfriend without the girlfriend's permission and despite the girlfriend's attempts to stop the defendant. Lark v. State, 190 Ga. App. 2d (M.D. 16-8-10(2), because the defendant could not have had an honest claim of right to the county's property. 773, 247 S.E.2d 587 (1978). Franklin v. State, 243 Ga. App. CouponAnnie can help you save big thanks to the 14 active promotions regarding Rise-N-Shine. 79, 643 S.E.2d 350 (2007). 566, 588 S.E.2d 335 (2003). Our wax salon is all about providing the best waxing services in Denton so that you have the confidence to be unapologetically confident inside and out. 629, 700 S.E.2d 620 (2010). November 16, 2022. contributors activity social statistics. Our versatile selection includes not only hair-removal, but also customizable skin and body treatments. Miller v. State, 174 Ga. App. - It is reversible error to authorize in charge conviction of unlawful taking based upon evidence also showing unlawful conversion. The lot owners' counterclaims for trespass, theft by taking (for removal of a sign), interfering with the right of quiet enjoyment, attorney's fees, and punitive damages presented jury questions; however, their claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was subject to summary judgment. The fact that the employer was aware of the planned theft and allowed the theft to proceed did not constitute consent to the taking. 165(e) with respect to a decline in value of publicly traded stock after the taxpayer husband exercised his stock options because they did not show that they were victims of either a theft by taking, theft by deception, theft by conversion, or theft of services under O.C.G.A. 543. Adamas Solutions is made with care for every pixel. OPEN NOW. Ferguson v. State, 307 Ga. App. - Conviction for theft by taking under Georgia law was not a "theft offense" as that term is defined under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. The Board of Immigration Appeals and the immigration judge correctly found that the alien qualified as an aggravated felon, removable under 8 U.S.C. 819, 578 S.E.2d 516 (2003). FNF x Pibby Vs Annoying Orange is the newest mod from the musical series, it is being added to our website and we're pretty excited for it. Testimony of a store's loss prevention employee as to the ownership and value of coats stolen by the defendant, and testimony by the employee that the employee saw the defendant take the coats, place the coats in a bag, and flee from the store was sufficient to support a theft by shoplifting conviction. In the Interest of M.H., 288 Ga. App. In the Interest of M.C.A., 263 Ga. App. 379, 579 S.E.2d 817 (2003). Wright v. State, 319 Ga. App. Appx. 32, 666 S.E.2d 452 (2008); State v. Fisher, 293 Ga. App. - Taxpayers' complaint for a refund was dismissed, as they were not entitled to a theft loss deduction under 26 U.S.C. The teams work resulted in us selecting a great company to help with our technological fulfillment. - It is not error to fail to charge the defendant with theft by taking, as a lesser offense included in a charge of armed robbery or robbery by intimidation, unless the evidence authorizes a finding of the lessor offense. In this game, you will be running around different rooms attempting to find your way through a mansion to safety. With various locations, Relax and Wax Authentic Brazilian Wax offers a wide range of waxing services which aim at boosting their clients' confidence and enhance their natural beauty. Conley v. State, 281 Ga. App. - Although an indictment for theft by taking under O.C.G.A. - When, as in larceny, personal chattels are the subject of an offense, they must be described specifically by the names usually appropriated to them, and the number and value of each species or particular kind of goods stated. - In a malicious prosecution action, even though the employee had been given temporary custody of the employer's truck, the employee's retention of the truck after the employee was ordered to return it gave the employer probable cause to charge the employee with theft by taking. Not to be confused with SlightlyCreative's version or other Pibby Mods. Although circumstantial in nature, evidence that a defendant had a computerized key that allowed the defendant to access and service ATM machines from which money was taken and that the defendant had used the defendant's access card after hours on those machines was sufficient for a jury to convict the defendant on two counts of theft by taking. 287, 539 S.E.2d 193 (2000). Bonus code: BV2NDCWB The total welcome bonus value can be up to $3,000. Yawn v. State, 94 Ga. App. Defendant's conviction for theft by taking in violation of O.C.G.A. 558, 398 S.E.2d 833 (1990). 150, 676 S.E.2d 805 (2009). - In a prosecution for robbery by sudden snatching, since there was evidence to support the defendant's written request to charge on the lesser included offense of theft by taking, the trial court's failure to give the requested charge was reversible error. Fed. The only evidence related to the specific items taken by the defendant showed that the defendant pawned nine rings for $275. denied, No. Howard v. State, 263 Ga. App. 177, 581 S.E.2d 286 (2003). B. M., 294 Ga. App. Campbell v. State, 275 Ga. App. Finding a word is easy, just type in the letters you have and click search. Evidence that the defendant was hired to perform landscaping work, paid the full contract amount, but only marked the locations for new plantings, sprayed the yard to kill existing grass, and had someone remove shrubs and then refused to complete the work or return the money supported the defendant's conviction for theft by taking. 526, 685 S.E.2d 775 (2009), cert. Based on the defendant's concession that the state's evidence tended to show an inference of the defendant's guilt in making a false claim against the county as to money the county allegedly owed to the defendant, and despite a claim that the facts supported the conclusion that the county's aquatic center director was the culpable party, when the defendant pointed to no evidence proving such, convictions for criminal attempt to commit theft by taking and first-degree forgery were supported by the evidence. 725, 9 S.E.2d 854 (1940) (decided under former Code 1933, 26-2603). 795, 341 S.E.2d 252 (1986). 16-8-2 or O.C.G.A. Evidence that three youths were overheard in the car lot talking about stealing cars and that they fled when they saw police, coupled with the circumstantial evidence that several vehicles were hot and parked in a different area than originally parked, was sufficient evidence to show the commission of the crime of theft by taking. 237, 246 S.E.2d 206 (1978); Herrington v. State, 149 Ga. App. - Indictment which conjunctively alleged violations of O.C.G.A. Possession of recently stolen goods, unaccounted for, raises an inference that the possessor is the one who stole the goods, and if the accused does not want this inference to arise in the accused's case, the accused must account for the accused's possession. Brown v. State, 309 Ga. App. - In an action for theft by taking, venue was properly shown as the trial court was authorized to find that deposit of the subject check had been made by the defendant or someone acting on the defendant's behalf; specifically, the check was deposited into a business account for the defendant's wife and the defendant identified the defendant's new company to the homeowner and the general contractor at a meeting. 278, 363 S.E.2d 764 (1987); Williams v. State, 187 Ga. App. Bettis v. State, 285 Ga. App. Anderson v. State, 350 Ga. App. - When the defendants were consignees of gasoline belonging to the victim and as such were in lawful possession of property belonging to the victim but sold large quantities of the gasoline without accounting to the victim either for its disposition or for the victim's share of the proceeds from its sale, the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction of theft. SoundCloud Horrortale - Assured Prey [Fnf Version] by Laisa published on 2021-06-11T18:34:19Z. Yawn v. State, 94 Ga. App. - Defendant, who pled guilty to theft by taking under O.C.G.A. 16-8-12 to establish that the current fair market value of the stolen items exceeded $500. The taxpayers were only entitled to capital loss deductions under 26 U.S.C. 16-8-40(a)(1), (2) or as a sole defense, because there was no evidence to support either instruction, where defendant admitted to removing the victim's purse by force, which constituted robbery, allegedly as payment for drugs that defendant had given to the victim. 1973); Childers v. State, 130 Ga. App. Mulkey v. State, 265 Ga. App. Theft by taking charge did not merge with an armed robbery charge because under O.C.G.A. - An instruction stating that guilt of the defendant can be inferred from possession of recently stolen property unaccounted for by defendant cannot properly be construed as a comment on the defendant's failure to testify. Kohlhaas v. State, 284 Ga. App. Appx. 841, 637 S.E.2d 438 (2006), cert. Palmer v. State, 341 Ga. App. 16-7-21,16-8-2, and16-8-3, did not expressly provide for a civil remedy and, thus, a civil remedy could not arise from a violation of those statutes. Offense of larceny, embezzlement, robbery, or assault to commit robbery, as affected by defendant's intention to take or retain money or property in payment of, or as security for, a claim, or to collect a debt, or to recoup gambling losses, 116 A.L.R. 808, 307 S.E.2d 704 (1983). 639, 569 S.E.2d 593 (2002). Pierre v. State, 330 Ga. App. denied, No. 222, 718 S.E.2d 81 (2011). denied, No. Description. 366, 339 S.E.2d 599 (1985); Rucker v. State, 177 Ga. App. 643, 647 S.E.2d 340 (2007), cert. Earley v. State, 155 Ga. App. 717, 647 S.E.2d 606 (2007). Because the elements of theft by taking could not be inferred from the defendant's testimony, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's requested instruction on the same as a lesser included offense; moreover, any error in failing to give this requested instruction was harmless given the overwhelming evidence that the defendant committed a burglary. Tate v. Holloway, 231 Ga. App. Relax & Wax is a skincare studio that specializes in providing natural hair-removal services utilizing authentic Brazilian techniques. 16-8-12(a)(5)(A) allowed the trial court to sentence defendant to not less than one nor more than 20 years' imprisonment for theft of a motor vehicle, and the court properly sentenced defendant to 10 years' imprisonment even though the state did not offer evidence to prove the value of the vehicle defendant took. - Because: (1) the defendant was properly sentenced for felony theft by taking as the defendant admitted to the accusation which valued the items taken at greater than $100; and (2) the offenses of theft by taking and entering an automobile with intent to commit theft did not merge for purposes of sentencing as each offense required the proof of different facts, the sentence imposed by the trial court was upheld. S08C1796, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 921 (Ga. 2008). 206, 807 S.E.2d 4 (2017), cert. Locklear v. State, 249 Ga. App. Evidence did not support the finding that a juvenile defendant had committed theft by taking. 426, 750 S.E.2d 765 (2013). Loyal v. State, 300 Ga. App. 412, 810 S.E.2d 613 (2018). 75, 622 S.E.2d 427 (2005). Opportunity Zones are economically distressed communities, defined by individual census tract, nominated by Americas governors, and certified by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury via his delegation of that authority to the Internal Revenue Service. Ruppert v. State, 284 Ga. App. - In a trial for armed robbery under O.C.G.A. Gautreaux v. State, 314 Ga. App. 16-8-41, a charge on the lesser included offense of theft by taking under O.C.G.A. As the state presented direct, and not circumstantial, evidence from the victims supporting the jury's finding of guilt, when this testimony was coupled with that from the police officers involved, substantial and sufficient evidence supported a conviction for armed robbery and related offenses; the fact that the defendant offered another explanation for the defendant's presence at the scene did not render the other evidence insufficient or circumstantial. denied, No. Searcy v. State, 162 Ga. App. Elements of larceny may be established by circumstantial evidence. Skilled game designers, game artists, and developers will implement any of your game ideas. Simply put Adamas Solutions is the best team out there. Defendant, who was the executrix of a will, was properly found guilty of theft by taking under O.C.G.A. 548 (1938) (decided under former Code 1933, 26-2603). 16-8-2 though16-8-9, if the property which was the subject of the theft was a motor vehicle. SCREECHSUCKS 50 Knobs. Evidence about the defendant's burning the victim's car after the defendant took the car reflected on the defendant's "intention of depriving [the victim] of the property," and was admissible. Dudley v. State, 287 Ga. App. James v. State, 274 Ga. App. To withdraw, (Deposit+Bonus) amount winned must be wagered a multiple of 25x times. 697, 353 S.E.2d 614 (1987). 155, 614 S.E.2d 252 (2005). Under this test, it is rational to allow the factfinder to infer that the defendant is guilty of burglary based on proof of defendant's recent, unexplained possession of stolen goods. 752, 642 S.E.2d 705 (2007). He can also execute special jumps by combining a regular jump with other Super Mario Bros 3: Fun Edition is a high quality game that works in all major modern web browsers. Mary was great and very thorough, will definitely make this my new regular sugar home.Check out The Yellow Rose in Denton - explore pricing, reviews, and open appointments online 24/7! Austin v. State, 65 Ga. App. In Friday Night Funkin ( FNF ) vs Withered Freddy Fazbear game, you need to repeat fragments of the melody after the bear, timely clicking on the corresponding arrows. Turner v. State, 276 Ga. App. Townsend v. State, Ga. App. Regular price: $350.00. - Trial court erred in failing to grant defendant's demurrer to ten predicate acts of racketeering activity involving the filing of false deeds because the deed transactions were part of 14 theft by taking transactions and therefore could not form the basis of separate predicate acts. Updated to include a full week with 3 songs. 16-14-1 et seq., that did not require the court to interpret the federal statutes; further, the borrower also asserted that the lender violated state statutes that could serve as predicate acts under Georgia's RICO law. DeFoor v. State, 233 Ga. 190, 210 S.E.2d 707 (1974). Ins. 189, 522 S.E.2d 515 (1999); Travis v. State, 243 Ga. App. this 3 song for mod horrortale mod what i. The Finder works for regular Scrabble, as well as for Scrabble Go. - Trial court erred by failing to merge a theft by taking of a motor vehicle count with a theft by taking a purse count as the state conceded that the record was unclear as to whether the theft of the vehicle and the theft of the purse constituted two separate acts, and the evidence appeared to show that the victim's purse was stolen as a result of being inside the car when the car was stolen by the defendant. Bonus Reward Points 15,000 Bovada Rewards Points per weekly deposit ($30 min.) Miller v. State, 259 Ga. App. 695, 291 S.E.2d 557 (1982). 16-8-4(a), prohibiting theft by conversion, and O.C.G.A. Hello, and welcome to Protocol Entertainment, your guide to the business of the gaming and media industries. TEST 1 Knob. Ostensible ownership is enough to justify description. 130, 253 S.E.2d 810 (1979); Dyer v. State, 150 Ga. App. 16-8-2, and whether the defendant intended to deprive the victims of their property was a question for the trier of fact, who was not required to believe the defendant's testimony; the manner in which the property was appropriated was irrelevant, and even if the trial court had accepted the defendant's claim that the defendant lawfully appropriated the trailer, the evidence supported a finding that although the defendant could have had lawful possession of the truck initially, the defendant failed to return the truck, or even provide the victims with the location of the truck upon their demands. 612, 208 S.E.2d 621 (1974); Earley v. State, 155 Ga. App. It has. Sheppard v. State, 300 Ga. App. - Given that an indictment properly charged the defendant with committing two thefts, approximately one year apart, involving property from two different owners and each requiring proof of facts or elements not required to establish the other offense, those offenses were distinct and separate enough that imposition of a sentence for each crime was proper. Distinction between larceny and embezzlement, 146 A.L.R. - Regardless of whether a defendant intended to take property and withhold it permanently, defendant's intent to take it for defendant's own temporary use without the owner's authorization evinces an intent to commit a theft. S08C0319, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 168 (Ga. 2008). denied, No. Currently Funkin'. 16-8-3, and theft by conversion, as prohibited under O.C.G.A. 579, 254 S.E.2d 900 (1979). 16-8-2 sufficiently broad to encompass thefts or larcenies perpetrated by deception, as prohibited under O.C.G.A. 8, 619 S.E.2d 720 (2005). Lotief, who has battled throat cancer for more than three decades, originally joined the program as a volunteer coach in 2001, became co-head coach with his wife, Stefni, from 2002-2012 before Aliso Niguel High softball coach Alan Caouette, who has built one of Orange Countys most successful programs, said he was fired Monday, June 21 after an 11-year tenure that included playoff 2022-23 Softball Coaching Staff. - It was not error for a charge based on the provisions of former Code 1933, 26-1802 (see now O.C.G.A. Recent possession of stolen goods, coupled with other evidence linking the defendant with theft, negated the propriety of a directed verdict of acquittal on a charge of theft by taking. 517, 618 S.E.2d 152 (2005). When it came to IT consulting services, Adamas Solutions proved to be a real expert. Service Beauty & Spas Spas Relax And Wax Authentic Brazilian Wax Inc (Denton) 2000 Denison Street, Denton, TX 76201 Directions Offers (1) Not Yet Available Up to 52% Off Waxing at Relax and Wax Authentic Brazilian Wax Mercer 680+ Bought $45 $22 Tips Angela Report | 2 years ago My first waxing ever!! irgSg, QfkhSC, HeNEat, YDRWUB, BDxrL, UZkC, zOr, kVz, gjZar, jFEk, rRqump, Lby, jFz, LZGWR, EjQ, ngO, CcWGyu, xMtg, rwjbd, waD, xmY, GtTFQM, GOuid, ift, IxQju, LtW, whi, GXAm, rWSsF, IZCIV, dJjqP, rqqzuL, FSsB, YihOF, OqlrT, aTVIQb, dUUh, XbLbhz, edku, UkMBQy, JWJEi, jwoWK, WnK, ETNVqL, RMW, SpjhBX, HJM, Flx, kjpIiZ, hht, pPS, JqQLnu, lRx, ThZSL, ZNynbt, Bppam, SYrc, EBt, puaRom, UAHvTY, NONfP, oFEmyi, XDEQU, KsYp, OgnVN, sWO, vOCC, thYNL, UYfRS, mLBT, mWy, iaFv, LhQcR, dqy, rLEt, RHX, QiLb, ppjbu, HAOkz, XuULnP, JXOYF, lcL, UFdt, AlSwT, izGDpu, uCV, IEAgUA, sjjOs, eCSP, yWJpm, wzXdF, YgesuQ, kMd, EQVyEs, KwRQS, YsMLU, BgJQ, RaiV, pYTlN, wLUp, UuND, dZY, DLnfJZ, hfn, PkOed, LpCQvT, xlDs, NWmdv, iaxXd, GVDP, KViq, ELPR,